A group of Master Masons talk about topics of Masonic interest--each from their own unique perspective. You'll find a wide range of subjects including history, trivia, travel, book reviews, great quotes, and hopefully a little humor as well on topics of interest for Freemasons and those interested in the subject of Freemasonry.
Learning Lessons from the viral sensation that is Bama Rush
Troward:The Hidden Power - Part 3
I've emphasized that the "innermost within" of all things is living Spirit. The Science of Spirit differs from the Science of Matter because it considers Energy as a responsive intelligence, which is not covered by physical science. These two points are crucial if we want to understand Spirit clearly and avoid being misled by purely physical science arguments. The liveliness of the originating principle, evident in all living things, shows intelligence and responsiveness, which are sometimes subtle but undeniable.
It's hard to deny that an intelligent order runs throughout nature. The more deeply we investigate the world, the clearer it becomes that all science translates into words or symbols of a pre-existing order. The highest clarity of this existing order, which our minds can understand, is the highest form of human intellect. This suggests a corresponding intelligence in the universe, creating a harmonious whole. Unless we dismiss the idea of a divine craftsman working outside himself, we need to explain the phenomenon of nature's intricate design. This points to the Living Spirit inherent in everything, giving it form, purpose, and definition.
There is no randomness in nature. Every action and reaction in atoms, molecules, tissues, organs, and individuals is guided by an intelligent force. At each stage, the collective intelligence surpasses the sum of individual parts. These observations can be proven by physical science and play a significant role in spiritual science, showing how spirit adapts means to ends and harmonizes existence. This intelligence is inherent in Spirit, as there is no other source from which it could come. Thus, Spirit is intelligent, and its actions are guided by this intelligence.
Spirit is also responsive. We must recognize that while lower degrees of Spirit's intelligence don't match the intelligence of the complex whole, Spirit, in its entirety, is highly organized and intelligent. This higher organization shows a degree of Spirit that is superior and capable of exercising control over all aspects of life.
Being intelligent, Spirit knows and, in knowing, it is life itself. It recognizes higher powers, and through attraction, it is drawn to higher levels of itself. Spirit is intelligent and responsive, embodying personality. This suggests that Spirit in all its forms contains elements of personality, even if not always expressed individually.
In essence, Spirit is always personal. When we reach a high degree of synthesis, we recognize ourselves as manifestations of personality. Humanity represents this manifestation on every plane, and the spirit in us must originate from a high level of spiritual substance.
We find that the highest expressions of Spirit in humanity reflect the personality that understands itself and organizes its purposes. Spirit in its various forms must act according to its own intelligent and responsive nature, creating order from itself.
However, if we misuse Spirit's power for personal gain, we fall short. Spirit must be used for its creative purpose, leading us to higher potential. Following the law of Spirit, we advance toward greater fulfillment. The Spirit of Life is ultimately summed up in "goodness." Spirit is Life, and every action aligns with benefiting the whole. This is Spirit's law, showing its intelligence and responsiveness to its inherent character.
The guiding principle of Spirit is "goodness." We must use the Spirit's power wisely, aiming for universal benefit. This means acting in line with the core law of Spirit, promoting growth, intelligence, and responsiveness for the greater good.
Understanding Spirit as both intelligent and responsive allows us to see how it operates through the natural and spiritual realms. This dual approach shows that Spirit is the foundation of all existence, guiding us to live harmoniously with its laws and principles.
Adapted from the original work: Troward, T. (1921). The Hidden Power, and other papers upon Mental science. Robert M. McBride & Company. All Material Cited is Free Use within the Public Domain.
The Hiramic Legend is not the Hero's Journey
In 1949 Joseph Campbell published his seminal work Hero with a Thousand Faces, in which he outlines a motif he noticed in many myths concerning heroes and heroic quests. This motif of the hero’s journey has become so prolific and disseminated so extensively that it now stands as its own archetype irrelevant to Campbell’s text, so much so that there are a surprising number of people who are totally ignorant that the hero’s journey was invented in the mid-20th century by a professor at Sarah Lawrence College.
Hero with a Thousand Faces is actually a brilliant work, and I would recommend it to anyone, though I have my disputes with Campbell. The text is a step-by-step guide through the motif of heroes and their quests by comparative method. But rather than iterate a bunch of myths in full and then point out where certain elements of the motif line up, he walks the reader through the motif, element by element, and then picks and pulls scenes from a vast variety of myths to demonstrate the motif. As the reader progresses through the text, Campbell builds more and more upon complex ideas and ideologies, so that the reader feels like they went on a quest and returned empowered by it.
However, one criticism I have of Campbell is rooted in his Jungian approach to mythology, namely taking the comparative method a little too far to an improper conclusion. Frequently where Campbell sees similarities between two things in content, he ignores the context, and concludes that they are rooted in the same unconscious archetype. Professor Elizabeth Vandiver makes a similar critique of Campbell. For instance, Vandiver points out that where Wonder Woman is an Amazonian woman, Campbell believes that the Amazonians of the DC Universe are mythologically the same as the Amazonians of ancient Greek mythos. This completely ignores the context in which the two Amazonians are being presented. The Greeks present the Amazons as wild, untamed, unruly feminine nature that needs marriage and men to calm them down and domesticate them; the DC Amazonians are just strong, powerful women of ancient heritage. They are not the same in context.
The Hiramic Legend is similar. At first glance, it does appear very similar to the hero’s journey motif, but there are some critical elements which remove Hiram Abif as any sort of hero. Firstly, and probably the most notable difference is that Hiram dies. This simply is not how the hero’s journey works. The hero must return, and not just return alive, but must bring back a boon to the world. That boon may be a physical object, such as Prometheus bringing fire to men, or it may be more of an understanding and wisdom to the benefit of others, such as Frodo and his three hobbit companions who return to save the Shire from Saruman. Hiram Abif does none of these things. He just dies and rots.
Campbell lays out a series of events that the hero will undertake during their adventure. Not all myths have these elements. The hero’s journey is not really a true mythological motif, but rather a “monomyth,” a sort of template in various myths and legends, and so it has a degree of flexibility. Campbell outlines seventeen elements that are central to the hero’s journey. Now, if the Hiramic Legend checked off the majority of these, then we might have reasonable grounds to say it is or nearly is a hero’s journey, but by my assessment, it checks off almost none of these, if any.
Firstly, there is the “call to adventure,” followed by a “refusal of the call.” Hiram does neither of these. He is accosted and harassed to give up the secrets of a Master Mason, but he refuses. However, this is not the same thing as a call and refusal to adventure. That would mean the call to adventure is to illicitly divulge the secrets of a Master Mason, which isn’t very virtuous, and in fact would defeat the entire point of the legend: the virtue of maintaining the secrets of our fraternity.
Next, the hero receives a helper. Odysseus has the aid of Athena, Luke Skywalker has Han Solo and C3PO et al (Star Wars was directly influenced by Campbell’s work), King Arthur has his knights, et cetera. But poor Hiram is alone. Then there is “the crossing of the threshold,” followed by a point of no return, or what Campbell calls “the Belly of the Whale.” Yeah… Hiram just dies and is dug up later and given a proper burial. Some have argued that Hiram’s death and the raising of his dead body from the grave is like Jesus rising from the dead, or Osiris being revived (briefly) and made king of the dead, and other gods of death and resurrection, but Hiram does not fit this motif (what is called a “vegetable god”). Hiram is not revived. He just dies and his body is exhumed. These are not the same thing.
I could keep going, but there really is no point, because we will repeatedly deal with elements of the hero’s journey that do not fit the Hiramic Legend (e.g. the “temptress woman”), and ultimately we must conclude that Hiram is not a hero in any conceivable way. He is simply a tragic character.
That said, just because the legend is not a hero’s journey, the Hiramic Drama does provide the apparatus for the candidate to experience a hero’s journey. That’s pedantic, but there is a difference between the Hiramic Legend and the Hiramic Drama. It is, first and foremost, a drama, and then later it is a legend. As a drama, it is an experience for the candidate. As a legend, it expounds upon esoteric values and interpretations a posteriori. For the candidate, the drama is a journey. You know you did not want to sit in the South. You knew something was up when you were called to the East. What a ride, and you come out the other end rectified. For me, I truly felt like a new man after the whole thing, and unlike poor Hirma, I was not dead. And you, as a newly raised Master Mason, are a boon to the Craft, because you have become another living stone for spreading Masonic light and growth of the fraternity.
It is pedantic, but it is important to distinguish between the Hiramic Legend and Drama. I personally feel that the scene of the death of Hiram Abif is far more powerful as a drama, because it is a transformative apparatus for each newly made Master Mason. As a legend, it just becomes a jumping-off point for esotery and elaborations (or confabulations) and the proliferation of new degrees. But as a drama, it stands as an experiential program. The drama may be modified, and it has changed over the decades, but the essence of the drama remains: a heroic journey of transformation for Masons.
When Somebody Decides to Take Back Their Petition
Petitions for Masonic Lodges come in all the time. I can only imagine how many people in a month’s time hand in petitions that the Grand Lodge then has to work through-- especially a larger Grand Lodge like the Grand Lodge of Illinois, where we have over 400 Lodges around the state.
States like Texas are undoubtedly even more inundated. Most of those petitions move through the process, and men join the Craft. Whether by traditional means or even one-day classes. But that’s not what this piece is about. You might be thinking, “He’s going to go on a diatribe about the “West Gate,” and how we should guard it--and you’d be a little bit right, but not completely.
Sometimes the “West Gate” guards itself. What do I mean by that? Well, every so often a petition comes in, and that person pays their fees to petition the Lodge. They turn everything in and think that their journey is well underway. To be fair, it usually is well underway. Usually, someone from the Lodge receives the petition, I ask them a few questions to ensure that this is something they want to do and tell them about the process of joining, and how long it might take. Such was the case about five years ago.
About five years ago, one of my Lodges received a petition. At this particular Lodge, we required a background check to be submitted with every petition. The background check is acquired by the petitioner and he then prints out the results and turns it in with his petition and fees.
Among other things on the petition, are the standard-type questions you might find. Our lodge in particular, however, has some extra pieces of information that we like to check over. Those pieces of information include all of the petitioner’s social media profiles. These are investigated to ensure that there is compatibility within the Masonic Fraternity and that nothing is out of the ordinary.
Back to our petitioner, he was very interested, he filled out his petition and had his money set aside, but when he received his investigation background report, he decided he would rather withdraw his petition than hand it in to us. I can’t tell you what was on that background report, but I can’t tell you, I suspect something he didn’t want us to know about was there and so, he withdrew his petition. Is that the end of the story? Not a chance!
About three years had passed by when this same man decided to petition our lodge again—or so he thought. He had reached out to our Lodge once more and mentioned that he had previously petitioned our Lodge, but for personal reasons, needed to withdrawal his petition. I informed him that I had remembered him and that if he wished to proceed, the process is the same as it was last time. Petition, fees, and a background check.
He never replied to me again.
Fast forward to the present day and to a different Lodge. This time, my Mother Lodge. Several weeks ago, a nice man started coming down to our Lodge and having dinner with us. He was getting to know the members and vice versa. All was on track for him to eventually petition our Lodge.
A couple of weeks ago, he decided it was time. He received his three recommendation signatures and had his fees in cash. (My mother Lodge doesn’t do background checks.) When he handed it in, I asked if I could ask him a few questions. He agreed and we retired to the library, where we spoke candidly, and I got a feel for who he was and why he wanted to join. Everything seemed to be fine.
One week later, he came down to the Lodge to meet and share fellowship and it was at this time, he perhaps experienced something that put him on edge. I couldn’t tell you what it was. Perhaps it was that Freemasonry’s Brotherhood “…goes to 11.” Maybe he wasn’t used to this kind of kindness? This kind of acceptance? This kind of real connection?
The result was that he rescinded his petition. It was strange, but it happened. Some who’ve heard this story ask why we didn’t press him on joining or changing his mind. The Lodge felt that this would be a mistake. If a man isn’t ready, well—then he just isn’t ready.
Yes, guarding the “West Gate” is important. It’s a primary concern. And it also bears mentioning that sometime…once in a blue moon, the West Gate, guards itself.
~RHJ
RWB Johnson is an Emeritus managing Editor of the Midnight Freemasons blog. He is a Freemason out of the 2nd N.E. District of Illinois. He currently serves as the Secretary of Spes Novum Lodge No. 1183. He is a Past Master of Waukegan Lodge 78 and a Past District Deputy Grand Master for the 1st N.E. District of Illinois. He is the current V:. Sovereign Grand Inspector for AMD in IL. Brother Johnson currently produces and hosts weekly Podcasts (internet radio programs) Whence Came You? & Masonic Radio Theatre which focuses on topics relating to Freemasonry. He is also a co-host of The Masonic Roundtable, a Masonic talk show. He is a husband and father of four, works full time in the executive medical industry. He is the co-author of "It's Business Time - Adapting a Corporate Path for Freemasonry", “The Master’s Word: A Short Treatise on the Word, the Light, and the Self – Annotated Edition” and author of "How to Charter a Lodge: A No-Nonsense, Unsanctioned Guide. More books are on the way